Skip to content

Blog

structkit vs cookiecutter vs copier: Which Project Scaffolding Tool Is Right for You?

If you've ever needed to scaffold a new project — a microservice, a Terraform module, a Python package — you've likely reached for cookiecutter or copier. They've served the community well for years. But in 2025, the needs of platform engineering teams have evolved: remote content sources, AI assistants, and organization-wide consistency at scale are now table stakes.

In this post we compare three tools: cookiecutter, copier, and structkit — to help you pick the right one for your workflow.

Consistent Project Scaffolding at Scale with structkit

Every engineering team eventually hits the same wall: onboarding a new service takes half a day of copying files, hunting down the right .gitignore, figuring out which CI template is current, and hoping the intern doesn't miss the security scanning step. The solution is usually a wiki page nobody reads, a "golden repo" that's three quarters out of date, or a Slack message to the platform team that disappears into the void.

structkit exists to solve this problem definitively.

Building a Terraform Module Scaffold with structkit

SEO: terraform module template generator, infrastructure as code scaffolding

TL;DR

If you maintain multiple Terraform modules, you know the pain: every new module starts with copy-pasting the same main.tf, variables.tf, outputs.tf, and .github/ setup. structkit lets you define that structure once in YAML and generate it consistently across your team.

Hello, world

Welcome to the blog! This is your first post.

You can add more posts under docs/blog/posts with frontmatter like title, date, and tags.